I don't think hot spare existed at V5R3. That came with later controller
cards and software.
--
Jim Oberholtzer
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
rob@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2015 11:09 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: remote 520 questions (more)
I can't speak for others but we often can't remember everyone's setup. Let
me see if I can figure this out. You have two machines. A local and a
remote. The remote is a 520 running V5R3. The local is also a 520 but it's
running V5R4.
And you asked if the remote loses a drive if there might be any data loss.
If it only loses ONE drive then there shouldn't be any data loss. I'm going
to assume that you are not using the hot spare option. After that drive
fails you really need to replace the drive. Well, if the decommisioning can
be measured in under a week after the disk failure then it's a business
decision as to whether or not it's an acceptable risk.
Rob Berendt
--
IBM Certified System Administrator - IBM i 6.1 Group Dekko Dept 1600 Mail
to: 2505 Dekko Drive
Garrett, IN 46738
Ship to: Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com
From: John McKee <jmmckee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 01/09/2015 11:37 AM
Subject: remote 520 questions (more)
Sent by: "MIDRANGE-L" <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
I was asked mor questions.
As part of the (in)famous "decommissiong", we continue to find issues. For
example, I am looking at an output that has 171423 files. There are other
queues with a large number as well, but probably not as many. Cache
battery is gone.
Since we recently had cache battery and hard drive replaced on local
system, I feel confident (maybe foolishly?) that this isn't an issue, but
I
was asked. If a remote drive craps out - it is in a RAID set, is there
any
potential data loss? They are keeping things in output queues because
there is no alternative.
They need to keep the content, which brings up the related question, and I
am thinking no easy answer here. Remote is v5r3. Can the spool files be
converted to PDF? I am cringing at the thought of doing this for 171423
or
even 11,736 files. But, I have to ask. Does SPOOLTOOL have this
capability?
Due to large outques and I don't know how much actual junk, if SPOOLTOOLS
could do conversion to PDF (again, on v5r3 system), could it be installed
without pushing Dasd over the edge? System is at 88.5142 of 317.1G.
I created a user profile on local 520 (v5r4) with same user name and
password as my profile ob the remote system. Still could not open a DDM
file. Same error and reason code - 17. Maybe there is an exit program
involved, but command to look at exit programs has slipped away from
active
memory. Maybe it is just file authority. My login is tied to a group
profile so when I sign on, I have needed authority to access files. Maybe
whatever job provides DDM service needs that authority - if so, what
profile is that?
I deeply appreciate your patience and assistance. This whole process is
rapidly approaching the looney stage.
John McKee
midrange.com
