× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Booth Martin <booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I would counter that the beauty of using week for groupings is that weeks
are the only consistent calendar grouping we have. A week is 7 days.
Always. Months vary, quarters vary, and years vary. If one is looking for
trends and comparisons to make business decisions then consistent time
frames are imperative. The idea of having short weeks at the beginning and
ending of a year worries me.

And yet we still have to have years, and those years *by mathematical
necessity* cannot be perfectly aligned with 7-day weeks. (Blame Earth
for revolving slightly too slowly around the sun, or rotating slightly
too quickly about its axis.)

Any time you have to reconcile the cycles of multiple independent
natural phenomena, you are going to have to approximate and compromise
somewhere. I'll grant that months are definitely more screwed up than
they have to be, but all in all, the calendar does a respectable job
of balancing several competing concerns.

John Y.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.