Good News Everybody!
The new search engine is LIVE!
Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.
|
<<SNIP>>
I personally would process the files differently... ignore the
times, and instead "move" a file once processed, or as the first
stage of the process, (and/or change its time on the I via the I)
from a holding folder, to a processed folder or rename the file to a
"I've done this one" naming structure. (my fave way was to rename
files from ".txt" to ".txt.processing" and finally ".txt.done" which
meant they were self documenting which was a godsend if something
broke)
One obvious problem would be if multiple jobs might process the
file(s) and need some kind of "I'm doing this one, so you can't" kind
of "locks" for wont of a better term, although the same problem holds
true if using date/time changes.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.