×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Don't think you're missing anything, unless it would be
the advantage of using standard SQL vs proprietary CPYF ?
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Charles Wilt
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 2:14 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: SQL Merge vs. CPYF MBROPT(*UPDADD)
I'm glad that DB2 for i finally got the SQL MERGER statement...
And I see that it offers lot's of functionality...
However, for a basic merge ie.
MERGE INTO archive ar
USING (SELECT activity, description FROM activities) ac ON (ar.activity = ac.activity) WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE SET description = ac.description WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN INSERT (activity, description) VALUES(ac.activity, ac.description)
I don't really see any benefits over CPYF MBROPT(*UPDADD) FMT(*MAPDROP).
Other than perhaps the ability to use commitment control with merge.
Am I missing anything?
Charles
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
midrange.com
