SI41911 is superseded by SI45860, and we have that installed. Looks like we will have to contact IBM if it happens again.

Sam

On 12/5/2013 6:44 PM, CRPence wrote:

If the PTF SI41911 is already applied, then the problem is apparently
not *the same* as that documented in those APARs, and therefore this new
issue might best be reported to your service provider... or some other
PTF or action researched as a possible correction.


This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].