× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I am trying to conjure up a scenario where having QTEMP at the bottom of the list would be useful. So far, nothing. What problem would HarrisData be solving, and how are they solving it, by having QTEMP at the bottom?

I am not making a judgement here; I am only hoping to expand my designing scope.


On 9/8/2013 6:50 AM, paultherrien@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
I have always worked under this same philosophy (Qtemp at the top of the
LIBL), until I worked at a shop with HarrisData Payroll and Human Resources
modules. The HarrisData support people stated unequivocally that QTEMP must
be at the end of the libl or the HarrisData applications would not work
correctly. So when I work with HD applications I make sure the JOBDs and
LIBLs put QTEMP at the end of the list. For all other work I put QTMEP at
the top of the list. And in some cases now, I may make explicit overrides
to QTEMP objects where the environment cannot be reliably predicted.

Paul



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.