Re: New command SNDSMTPEMM

It's eaten lots of email over the years and continues to live.

Since we're into shameless plug day, our SMTP/400 product is also a valid alternative as well :-)

Regards,
Richard Schoen
RJS Software Systems Inc.
Where Information Meets Innovation
Document Management, Workflow, Report Delivery, Forms and Business Intelligence
Email: richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web Site: http://www.rjssoftware.com
Tel: (952) 736-5800
Fax: (952) 736-5801
Toll Free: (888) RJSSOFT
------------------------------

message: 5
date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 14:06:13 -0500
from: Bradley Stone <bvstone@xxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: New command SNDSMTPEMM

They should have uncoupled from MSF years ago and did a complete rewrite.

I'm glad they didn't as it seems they are taking all the good
ideas/products from ISVs and incorporating it into their OS. (why not
teamwith them/recommend their solutions instead?)

But with a couple 3rd party vendors with more configurable and functional
options (including our MAILTOOL software) I still wonder why some cling to
SNDDST, this new command, and IBM's MSF system. :) Of course I am biased,
but for good reason...

Brad
www.bvstools.com


On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Bryan Dietz <bdietz400@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I put in a PMR(actually a few) when this command was released.

Make sure you get the latest PTFs for your version.

I exchanged emails with support about adding the send from address.
was told it was not designed for that.
I believe I submitted a DCR for that change and to "uncouple" the
command from MSF

--
bryan