Re: New command SNDSMTPEMM

[Tim Bronski <tim.bronski@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 7/24/2013 10:13 PM, Richard Schoen wrote:
> It's eaten lots of email over the years and continues to live.
>
> Since we're into shameless plug day, our SMTP/400 product is also a valid alternative as well :-)
...as is the FREE Arpeggio ARP-MAIL.
> Regards,
> Richard Schoen
> RJS Software Systems Inc.
> Where Information Meets Innovation
> Document Management, Workflow, Report Delivery, Forms and Business Intelligence
> Email: richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Web Site: http://www.rjssoftware.com
> Tel: (952) 736-5800
> Fax: (952) 736-5801
> Toll Free: (888) RJSSOFT
> ------------------------------
>
> message: 5
> date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 14:06:13 -0500
> from: Bradley Stone <bvstone@xxxxxxxxx>
> subject: Re: New command SNDSMTPEMM
>
> They should have uncoupled from MSF years ago and did a complete rewrite.
>
> I'm glad they didn't as it seems they are taking all the good
> ideas/products from ISVs and incorporating it into their OS.  (why not
> teamwith them/recommend their solutions instead?)
>
> But with a couple 3rd party vendors with more configurable and functional
> options (including our MAILTOOL software) I still wonder why some cling to
> SNDDST, this new command, and IBM's MSF system.  :)  Of course I am biased,
> but for good reason...
>
> Brad
> www.bvstools.com
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Bryan Dietz <bdietz400@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I put in a PMR(actually a few) when this command was released.
> >
> > Make sure you get the latest PTFs for your version.
> >
> > I exchanged emails with support about adding the send from address.
> > was told it was not designed for that.
> > I believe I submitted a DCR for that change and to "uncouple" the
> > command from MSF
> >
> > --
> > bryan