Re: New command SNDSMTPEMM

[Richard Schoen <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mail Server Framework should have been taken out back and shot year ago...............................

It's eaten lots of email over the years and continues to live.

Since we're into shameless plug day, our SMTP/400 product is also a valid alternative as well :-)

Regards,
Richard Schoen
RJS Software Systems Inc.
Where Information Meets Innovation
Document Management, Workflow, Report Delivery, Forms and Business Intelligence
Email: richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web Site: http://www.rjssoftware.com
Tel: (952) 736-5800
Fax: (952) 736-5801
Toll Free: (888) RJSSOFT
------------------------------

message: 5
date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 14:06:13 -0500
from: Bradley Stone <bvstone@xxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: New command SNDSMTPEMM

They should have uncoupled from MSF years ago and did a complete rewrite.

I'm glad they didn't as it seems they are taking all the good
ideas/products from ISVs and incorporating it into their OS.  (why not
teamwith them/recommend their solutions instead?)

But with a couple 3rd party vendors with more configurable and functional
options (including our MAILTOOL software) I still wonder why some cling to
SNDDST, this new command, and IBM's MSF system.  :)  Of course I am biased,
but for good reason...

Brad
www.bvstools.com


On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Bryan Dietz <bdietz400@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I put in a PMR(actually a few) when this command was released.
>
> Make sure you get the latest PTFs for your version.
>
> I exchanged emails with support about adding the send from address.
> was told it was not designed for that.
> I believe I submitted a DCR for that change and to "uncouple" the
> command from MSF
>
> --
> bryan