Re: Upgrading Load Source Disk -- MIDRANGE-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Upgrading Load Source Disk
From: Rick Hill <rhill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:12:50 +0000
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Just that we would have two 520's with the same disk layout.
Have two cec's with 8 4327 and two 0595 with 12 4328

Like you say really no issue either way.

----- Original Message -----
From: James H. H. Lampert [mailto:jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 12:08 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Upgrading Load Source Disk

On 7/10/13 8:54 AM, Rick Hill wrote:

Thanks Jim, It's basically a cosmetic issue just wanting them to look the same.

Huh? Why would they look different, unless you have a whole bunch of
access panels off the machine?

--
JHHL

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Upgrading Load Source Disk , John McKee

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.