×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Thanks Jim, It's basically a cosmetic issue just wanting them to look the same.
I will have to mull this over and decide is it worth the reload.
Really appreciate you getting back to me
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim Oberholtzer
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 11:46 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Upgrading Load Source Disk
You cannot go from larger to smaller, so what your trying to do won't work.
Reload time if you really need to do it.
Why do the disk configurations need to be the same? In the end it really doesn't matter to IBM i.
Jim Oberholtzer
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects
On 7/10/13 10:15 AM, Rick Hill wrote:
Hi,
I have a 9406 520 that I'm trying to copy the load source disk to a smaller size disk.
Actually trying to copy from a 4328 at 40% capacity to a 4327. When trying the
copy from DST it tells me no eligible disk for the copy. Does anyone know if this
is possible or anyone that has actually done this? We are doing this to try and
keep the disk configurations the same on our primary and target Iseries boxes.
Thanks for any help or guidance,
Rick
--
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.