RE: 9406 515 vs 8203 E4A -- MIDRANGE-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: RE: 9406 515 vs 8203 E4A
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:19:59 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

571GB 10k drives? I had to google that.
http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?subtype=ca&infotype=an&appname=iSource&supplier=897&letternum=ENUS111-065

My experience was that 10K drives were really slow compared to the 15K
drives, unless they really did something different with these new drives.
Or, since you have a plethora of SSD's, are you using the 10K drives for
"slow" data? Like old year end stuff, etc?

Rob Berendt

Follow-Ups:

RE: 9406 515 vs 8203 E4A , Steinmetz, Paul

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.