|
Why should they have done that? There already was a technology in place.gosh, all the effort that has gone into reenabling 5250 apps over the
The 5250 (and 3270) protocol was designed for one thing; reworking it to
solve a problem that didn't exist seems to be a waste of resources.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.