RE: I/O count differences

The system uses the index only on a no-hit. Never touches the data at all.

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of RPGLIST
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 10:23 AM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: I/O count differences

I need an explanation on this if someone would be so kind.

When I chain to a file with a key and get a hit, I fully expect the I/O
count to increase by 1, even though it is sort of doing a SETLL and then a
READE within the chain process. However, whenever it doesn't find a
record it shows no I/O count.

I understand that since it didn't find a record it brough nothing back
from the disk and therefore didn't increase the I/O count, but it
certainly used resources to spin all the way through that drive disk....Is
there anywhere that the system accoutns for this in the statistics?

I see the same results when performing a SETLL, If %Equal, actually even
if there is a hit I don't see an I/O count until the READE statement.



--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.