Re: RAID 6 versus RAID 5; your experience with RAID6? -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: RAID 6 versus RAID 5; your experience with RAID6?
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 13:48:03 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

We're using RAID 5 with no hot spare. We have monitoring software in
case, (scratch that) for when a disk fails. As soon as I get that message
I am supposed to call IBM (if they didn't call me first). And replace the
drive ASAP; weekend, night, prime time - no difference.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: RAID 6 versus RAID 5; your experience with RAID6? , Pete Massiello - ML

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.