No way! Future Systems, buddy! We gotta cover the S38, since those applications are still running on the modern platform...
-Eric DeLong
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of lketzes@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 8:18 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Cc: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion; midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Software Vendors (And US too) - A small rant
I still call it Silverlake.
Larry Ketzes
Lead Enterprise Infrastructure Engineer
lketzes@xxxxxxxxxxx
302-594-2146
From:
Trevor Perry <trevor@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
12/12/2012 09:03 AM
Subject:
Re: Software Vendors (And US too) - A small rant
Sent by:
midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Regardless of whether or not it is a good or horrible name, if we fight
it, we just look ridiculous. If we wish to support the platform, and
support our own future in this industry, fighting back with a personal
beef about a branding is just going to make us all look utterly
incompetent, and really does not help the future of the platform.
IBM have given us the IBM i branding, whether we like it or not, it is the
brand name that will be used for longer than any other on this platform.
Not a single one of us is skilled at marketing or branding, and definitely
not for a company like IBM. We don't and won't get a say in the branding,
period. It is time to get used to it, and get over our personal
preferences.
On 12/12/12 8:42 AM, "Mark D" <mdlkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
IBM I is a horrible name and nothing any of us can do will change that.
But we sure can fight it.
midrange.com
