|
And if IBM hadn't played internal politics and had listened to the user
community i OS would not belong to Apple. Great marketing step that.
But as you say, if we want to stay with IBM we have to go along with IBM
wanting to brand themselves as a hardware company.
Then again considering how well they listened to us, and Oracle
controlling Java (another great step on IBM's part), maybe moving off IBM
wouldn't be such a bad thing. Sacrilege I know but maybe the hard truth.
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Trevor Perry
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 7:36 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Software Vendors (And US too) - A small rant
The rebranding is no longer in the equation. IBM have given us the IBM i
branding to match their Power brand, and it will be with us for the long
term.
Either we, as a community, promote the current and future branding, or we
will be left behind in the DP department. And, with all the noise from
the MS crowd (and even Unix people), and some of our own community, we
need to support this incredible platform for the long term, not its
glorious past.
The challenge is to stop using arguments that keep us mired in the old
names and stuck in old ways of doing things.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.