×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
First, at a Pete Massiello presentation it was recommended to purge
deleted records by doing a display file description to an output file and
querying that. All well and good, but you can bypass the output file and
just do this
select NUMBER_DELETED_ROWS, SYSTEM_TABLE_SCHEMA, SYSTEM_TABLE_NAME,
SYSTEM_TABLE_MEMBER
from qsys2/syspartitionstat
order by number_deleted_rows desc
However, the performance is really slow. Which brings me up to my
question: Has IBM improved the performance of these view with either TR5
(out now) or the database group (due in November)? I thought I heard that
at COMMON but I can't find any references to this anywhere. Is this true?
Has anyone done some time trials on this?
Rob Berendt
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
