× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. September 2012

RE: BRMS suddenly requires second tape? - please read

Sorry it's been awhile since I last responded to this, but thank you all
for your comments.

I am doing the maintenance and reorganizing the DB as shown below.

MOVMEDBRM MOVPCY(TAPEMOVES) LOC(TAPMLB01)
STRMNTBRM PRTEXPMED(*NO) PRTVSNRPT(*NO) PRTBKUACT(*NO) PRTRCYRPT(*ALL)
RGZBRMDB(*YES)
WRKMEDIBRM CTLGRP(DMCTC2D) SLTDATE(*CURRENT)
OUTPUT(*PRINT)
WRKMEDBRM SORT(*VOL) OUTPUT(*PRINT)

I had been working on implementing new control groups to make them
consistent across all three of my partitions. The existing ones were set up
by a person who is no longer here. As a result of this issue I went ahead
and implemented my new control group and now we no longer need a second
tape... go figure.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.