×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
On 2012/8/16 9:10 PM, John McKee wrote:
What does the compiler do with this:
01 REC.
02 S1 PIC X(10).
02 S2 REDEFINES S1.
03 S2A PIC XXX.
03 S2B PIC XXX.
... what happens if S2A and S2B get
changed from PIC XXX to PIC X(6)? My thought would be an error to the
effect that S2 redefines S1 with unequal size.
The compiler seems accepts the version with the XXX's. With the XXX's
changed to X(6), it complains that it's redefining a smaller item.
Either way, it ignores the redefine S2 for XML GENERATE.
Message . . . . : The subordinate item 'S2' of XML GENERATE FROM
identifier 'REC' is ignored.
Cause . . . . . : XML GENERATE statement ignores a group item in
identifier 'REC' if all its subordinate items are ignored. Any
subordinate FILLER elementary item, or subordinate item whose data
description specifies the REDEFINES clause or RENAMES clause will b
ignored by the XML GENERATE statement.
Here's the rules for XML GENERATE.
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/iseries/v7r1m0/index.jsp?topic=%2Frzasb%2Fsc09253902.htm
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
