×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
I am I the only one who thinks these sound like homework questions for an
operations class?
From:
John Mathew <johnmathew400@xxxxxxxxx>
To:
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date:
07/24/2012 11:39 AM
Subject:
Re: Password Security
Sent by:
midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Really thats true defently the programmers productivity will go down...
dont know exactly why they need this...and the advantage of this.
I will give try not suggesting this...
John
________________________________
From: "Tommy.Holden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<Tommy.Holden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, 24 July 2012 9:54 PM
Subject: Re: Password Security
The programmers, etc can have the value for limiting sessions set on their
individual profiles to allow more sessions as desired.
Thanks,
Tommy Holden
From: "sjl" <sjl_abc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
Date: 07/24/2012 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: Password Security
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Your business analysts, and programmers [if you have any] are going to be
very upset with this requirement, since it significantly affects their
productivity.
- sjl
John wrote:
regarding option4
Sorry i was miscommunicated actually it should be prevent system and
user profiles from logging onto multiple workstations at same time.
I should not allow logging more than one session/workstation.... .....
QLMTDEVSSN (how many session we can limit with this)
Regards,
John
________________________________
From: "rob@xxxxxxxxx" <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, 24 July 2012 9:34 PM
Subject: Re: Password Security
Option 3. See QPWDVLDPGM. Search for that in the Infocenter. You can
customize that to your hearts content.
Option 4. So, you're willing to allow them to use multiple sessions of
5250 at once? Good for you! Now, you just want to stop them from running
multiple Queries at the same time interactively. Let's try a different
tack. Instead of that, how's about throttling their performance?
One way is to change the command RUNQRY to not allow it to run
interactively outside of a program at all. When you do a WRKQRY and use
any option to run it uses RUNQRY under the covers. See CHGCMD RUNQRY
<F4>. You can drop *INTERACT.
Another way to throttle them is lower the QRYTIMLMT by using the CHGQRYA
command.
You may also want to check the options available in the query options
file, otherwise known as QAQQINI. Search the infocenter on that.
Option 5 is the easiest. See WRKSYSVAL QPWDEXPITV
Rob Berendt
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.