×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
On 17 May 2012 09:37, Matt Olson wrote:
Using any of these commands is a PCI security auditors worst
nightmare. You might want to consider alternative options to using
these commands, we had to turn them all off after a security audit.
So is using an alternative to those commands, apparently private
features that would do effectively the same thing, somehow better for
any of the auditors, programmers, users, the security\integrity of the
requesting system, the security\integrity of the target system? If so,
then in what ways? Seems to me that if the target system was insecure
prior to the access to those features being denied, then the same
exposures remain at the target; being denied those methods still leaves
any other possible exploits... presumably even including the private
replacements.
Regards, Chuck
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
