Re: Stupid question

What exactly is it that fails?

Does it work correctly anywhere, like in a test environment?



On 5/1/2012 6:17 PM, John McKee wrote:

A CL is involved.  No OVRDBF.  Program is to run in batch.  A specific
data library is dded and  specific current library is set.  Same
libraries as in other CL that builds the first file.

John McKee

On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Booth Martin<booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:

Last possible thought from my feebly mind:

Is there a CL program in there somewhere, with OVRDBF or some other
mischief, or is it possible that there is a library list issue that is
giving you an old copy of one of the files?



On 5/1/2012 6:01 PM, John McKee wrote:

Both files are single format files.

I just double checked.  File I am attempting to update is an update
file.  I think compiler would have complined.

I was hoping to modify the original program to not write the duplicate
record in the first place.  Clear the m file, run morning job.  Noon,
move current file to am and run again.  Would seriously reduce excess
IO.  I thought I could get this simple thing working and then work on
the file build itself.

John McKee

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

--
Booth Martin
802-461-5349
http://www.martinvt.com
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.