× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Well, the OP's issue is not which command or tool to execute the SQL.
It's how to avoid CL's clunky string handling. Your &LIB2 and &FIL2
show just how ugly it is to compose even the simplest of strings in
CL, especially if they need to contain single-quotes.

John, yet what I proposed is a lot cleaner than what the OP had. There is
no SQL statement in the CL. Like others (with REXX), I was proposing an
alternative.

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Dave <dfx1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I agree with you. The EXECSQL command I created was my first ever
experience with REXX and I was amazed at it's power and the fact that
nobody seemed to know anything about it except it was old and not used
anymore! I was sad when it was revealed that it was REXX that was the
problem when we opened that LPAR sorry Rob, PMR ( the weekend here is
already well underway!) because the only REXX procedure on our system was
dropped. I believe it was because the program using the rexx that run the
sql was called many, many times. In fact, wrongly in my opinion. I had to
send the REXX to IBM. Maybe that's where RUNSQL came from!

Le 30 mars 2012 18:16, John Yeung <gallium.arsenide@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Dave <dfx1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Unfortunately there was an issue with REXX and SQL
after V6R1 in certain conditions.

Well, that doesn't change the fact that REXX has awesome string
handling and awesome integration with CL. So you can still just
compose your SQL string with REXX, and then issue the appropriate CL
command to invoke the SQL-executing tool of choice (in this case, the
OP is happy with RJS's DOCSQL).

Really, using "static" CL commands through REXX is virtually as simple
as using CL itself. (Just wrap your entire CL command in
double-quotes and you are done.) But when you want your CL command to
be dynamically composed, then REXX becomes way, way easier than CL,
because you can just intersperse your literal and variable portions
together (no *TCAT). It's ludicrously easy. And that's not even
touching on REXX's structured programming features and advanced
parsing, etc., etc., etc.

John
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.