Re: Virtual tape optimal image catalog entry size(s). -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Virtual tape optimal image catalog entry size(s).
From: Luis Rodriguez <luisro58@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 16:25:28 -0430
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Rob,

Can you do a CHGPF with REUSEDLT(*YES) to your work file? That way you
could avoid doing the RGZPFM (of course, if maintaining the arrival order
is important in your work file this option would not apply...) .

Regards,

Luis Rodriguez
IBM Certified Systems Expert — eServer i5 iSeries

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Virtual tape optimal image catalog entry size(s). , rob

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.