× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I concur - we may just have to sweat it out until Nov. 12th. I did have a look at the disk and there doesn't appear to be any issues.

One oddity I didn't mention - the box called home twice to notify IBM there was a memory issue. When IBM and I checked using the system tools, the system reported everything in good order - no hardware issues. The IBM rep was not convinced that everything was ok so he's sending out a technician to have a closer look at the issue.

Thanks to everyone who's responded so far. :)

/b;

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of rob@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 11:37 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: v6r1 upgrade woes

Could be upgrade - could be a bad case of coincidence.

Since the biggest killer is usually I/O I'd start there.
WRKDSKSTS, use F11 and make sure none are Degraded.

Also do a WRKPTFGRP. What 'Level's do you show "Installed" for SF99610, SF99609, SF99601?

Another thing to consider is that the sooner you call IBM on this the better. You may still have *MGTCOL's so they can do before/after comparisons to see what has changed. They get purged.



Rob Berendt
--
Group Dekko
Dept 1600
Mail to: 2505 Dekko Drive
Garrett, IN 46738
Ship to: Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com





From: Brian Piotrowski <bpiotrowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date: 10/31/2011 11:22 AM
Subject: v6r1 upgrade woes
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx



Hi all,

We finally completed our upgrade to v6r1 on the weekend on out 520 box.
The upgrade was flawless with the exception of having to turn off Extended
Passive Mode and Extended Port Mode for some of our FTP jobs. However, I
noticed that since the upgrade our system is running abnormally slow -
batch jobs are piling up and the overall system performance is lethargic.

We have two weeks until our migration to our new Power7 box, but I'm
wondering if there's anything I should look for in the meantime. Here's a
brief rundown of the current box:

- Model type - 9406-520

- Main Storage - 16GB (auto-adjusting)

- DASD - 850GB (49% utilized)

Just an FYI - we do have a lot of QZDASOINIT jobs that occupy a large
percentage of CPU utilization, but this was already occurring before the
upgrade, so there's something else occurring that is killing our system
performance.

Any ideas on where to start looking?

Thankee-sai!

/b;

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Brian Piotrowski
Assistant Mgr. - I.T.
Simcoe Parts Service, Inc.
Ph: 705-435-7814 x343
Fx: 705-435-5029
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
http://www.simcoeparts.com

Please consider the environment. Don't print this e-mail unless you really
need to.

The information contained in this communication is confidential and
intended only for the use of those to whom it is addressed. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify me by telephone
(collect if necessary) and delete or destroy any copies of it. Thank
you!


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.