×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Depends. One, on what your definition of "clear" is. Two, what
expiration date you gave on the save.
If you specified your save as permanent, then you may have to INZTAP the
virtual tape. But if your definition of clear is removing all the image
catalog entries, then, no, you shouldn't have to do that.
Unless it tells you it needs a cleaning tape. JUST KIDDING!!!! :-)
Since moving to managed tape with BRMS we never use *PERM on any saves
anymore. Never.
We also use separate volume id's for all physical tape media. This is
pretty much required for BRMS. We started it before then because of tape
libraries and having multiple tapes in the library. You don't put
duplicate volume ids in the same library. Actually we started it before
libraries because PRTERRLOG TYPE(*VOLSTAT) VOLTYPE(3590) will tell you the
volume id's of all tapes reporting errors and recommend some to be
replaced. Which brings up a point. When you do a DUPTAP if you use
TOVOL(*FROMVOL) and your virtual tape volume is always the same then your
physical volumes will always be the same and PRTERRLOG will be tough to
decipher. (note: even though we're using lto3 we still say VOLTYPE(3590)
- it works).
Rob Berendt
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.