Re: DDS Time vs. DDL Time -- MIDRANGE-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Re: DDS Time vs. DDL Time
From: Mike Wills <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:12:43 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Not sure if it was the order of the parameters or the format of the
date (or both). But I changed the date format to ISO and kept the time
format at ISO. I then reordered the parameters to the same order that
I had the insert statement defined as and it worked!

Thanks all for your feedback and the bounce-off to get this figured out.

--
Mike Wills
http://mikewills.me

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.