Re: JOBLOGS

[Vern Hamberg <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm not near a machine - am on vacation - I can only say for you to look 
at the help text, if you've not done so already, then come back - you 
might have your answers and help the rest of us!

Vern

On 8/12/2011 9:56 AM, Raul A. Jager W. wrote:
> I have seen the *PENDING option, I did't try it yet.  Will that put all
> joblogs in pending or only the ones that finish with "0"?
>
> Vern Hamberg wrote:
>
> > I believe that somewhere after V5R3 and new way of handling job logs was
> > added - something like *PENDING - look around for a system value about
> > job logs or job message handling, or look at the JOBD for something similar.
> >
> > On 8/12/2011 8:44 AM, Raul A. Jager W. wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Help!!
> > > I'm replacing an i5 V5.3 with a p7  v 7.1. In the old computer only the
> > > jobs that ended "abnormal" leave a joblog in the outq QEZJOBLOG, in the
> > > new one, all jobs end up in the output queue.
> > > I imagine it is because one of the default values is different, but I
> > > have no idea which one. I looked several manuals, up to now wihtout success.
> > > Can somebody give a hint?
> > >
> > > TIA
> > > Raul