On Wed 05-May-2011 11:59 , jmmckee wrote:
This may be a moot issue, however, as no matter how logical using a
trigger sounds, another person - not the sa in this case, is calling
the shots. His thinking is a batch job, run once a day, is good
FWiW, for a true "log file", I would most likely choose to perform
the additional work in a "log scrubber" whenever the actions can be
"batched overnight" [or on any schedule] versus whenever the actions
require more immediate action. A log file typically likely already will
have a scheduled process to trim unnecessary\outdated data [an effective
scrubber, but perhaps only for deleting rows], so adding a feature to
that existing process to handle the additional work of an email being
sent for certain rows can work well; esp. when there is a field that can
be changed to indicate the row has already been processed with the logic
and actions as performed by that added feature.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.