VTL = Virtual Tape Library?



On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Jim Oberholtzer <midrangel@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

The easy way to do this is to use a VTL locally, that also has the
replication built in. Put the secondary VTL in your favorite DR
center. I use Crossroads SPHiNX for these type of set ups. BRMS backs
up the SPHiNX, and the SPHiNX automatically replicates to the remote
site. Network traffic is manageable in that environment. The remote
cuts the archive tapes etc as needed. From the restore/back up
perspective 100% IBM native commands. SPHiNX also handles Window/Unix
as well.

Jim Oberholtzer
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects


On 4/19/2011 12:37 PM, rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
We looked at something like this. Vendors like Vault/400 and whatnot.
We
were hoping to bypass manual tape intervention and directly store the
data
at Iron Mountain or elsewhere. There were several hurdles:
- Concerns about network traffic.
- Having to use vendor supplied commands to save/restore versus IBM
supplied ones.
- Cost

Switching to BRMS really reduced the amount of time our operator was
spending in the morning tape routine.

Vendor supplied stuff like this scares me to death. Having to deal with
that really early on in a new release of OS does not appeal to me. The
last thing in the world I want is some vendor who brags that they still
support V2R3 but wants you to let them know if their stuff works on the
latest os (since they don't have a machine new enough to run something
even 2 releases back).

Rob Berendt
-- Group Dekko Dept 1600 Mail to: 2505 Dekko Drive Garrett, IN 46738
Ship to: Dock 108 6928N 400E Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com From: Ron Adams <rondadams@xxxxxxxxx> To:
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date:
04/19/2011 11:32 AM Subject: Backup using i2s3? or other svc? Sent by:
midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx Is anybody using this? I'm curious
about speed and cost? Is it cost effective, are there other services
that are comparable? I'm current sending save files to one our local
Windows servers, but the data stays in house. I would like to look at
the option of sending off-site to something like this, but, like
everything these days, it needs to be cost effective. Thanks, Ron On
Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Rich Loeber <rich@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Aaron,

<VENDOR RESPONSE>

You might want to look at our new i2S3 software that handles
save/restore
directly with Amazon S3. Here's a link to more information:

[1]http://www.kisco.com/i2s3/

Rich Loeber - @richloeber
Kisco Information Systems
[2]http://www.kisco.com




--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Aaron Bartell wrote:

What are others doing in the arena of backing up data to digital
mediums?
I
am just not a tape guy because that means I have to remember to
switch
something out. Right now I have a small Java app that I run and it
FTP's
source from the IBM i to my Linux desktop which subsequently is
backed
up
by
JungleDisk to Amazon's S3 service. What I would like to do is take
my
PC
out of the mix and backup more than just source (though I am mostly
only
interested in source as both of my machines are used for
development).

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.





This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].