× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. April 2011

Re: V5R4M5 to V6R1

Thanks Pete


That version of MQ is supported on IBM i Version 6 so you should be fine,
ut not supported on V7R1.







-----Original Message-----
From: Pete Massiello <pmassiello-ml@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion' <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Mon, Apr 4, 2011 7:19 pm
Subject: RE: V5R4M5 to V6R1


That version of MQ is supported on IBM i Version 6 so you should be fine,
ut not supported on V7R1.
Pete Massiello
Tech Solutions
ttp://www.itechsol.com
Add iTech Solutions on Facebook:
ttp://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=126431824120
dd iTech Solutions on LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2206093

-----Original Message-----
rom: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of fbocch2595@xxxxxxx
ent: Monday, April 04, 2011 4:07 PM
o: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
ubject: Re: V5R4M5 to V6R1

i Folks, thanks for the replies and Pete, your newletter is always a must
ead and I got your info and have completed the tasks you outlined below.
I have a question about WebSphere MQ which we still run. Must WebSphere MQ
e upgraded b4 going to V6R1? We're running at this level and the memo to
sers isn't clear if the upgrade is a must.

Name: WebSphere MQ
Version: 6.0.2.10
CMVC level: p600-210-100825

Thanks, Frank




----Original Message-----
rom: Pete Massiello <pmassiello-ml@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
o: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion' <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
ent: Mon, Mar 28, 2011 10:51 pm
ubject: RE: V5R4M5 to V6R1

ave you done your ANZOBJCVN? Reviewed the results? Contacted all 3rd
rty vendors? Have all your pre-req PTFs loaded and installed? Gotten the
sted i_BASE_01 CD. Go to 6.1.1 of the LIC instead.
erified that your machine will support 6.1? Have you read the memo to
ers?
here is a difference going to 6.1 and going to 7.1, please search the
chives for a note that I wrote on this about a month ago to know you need
be careful of. If everything checks out, then go to 7.1, but make sure
u understand the issues.
Pete
-
te Massiello
ech Solutions
tp://www.itechsol.com
dd iTech Solutions on Facebook:
tp://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=126431824120
d iTech Solutions on LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2206093
Tech Solutions because IBM i (AS/400s) didn't come with System
ministrators
-----Original Message-----
om: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
ailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of fbocch2595@xxxxxxx
nt: Monday, March 28, 2011 2:51 PM
: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
bject: V5R4M5 to V6R1
i Folks, we're finally going to upgrade to V6R1...I haven't seen any
oblems when doing this upgrade for awhile. Anyone have any new stories to
are regarding this upgrade or is there little to nothing to worry about
en doing this upgrade?
anks, Frank

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.