×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Have you considered using TYPE(*MBRLIST) instead? It's a similar list but with a simpler record format.
Paul Morgan
Principal Programmer Analyst
IT Supply Chain/Replenishment
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jerry C. Adams
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 1:02 PM
To: Midrange-L
Subject: CL Field Size Workaround
I am trying to write a CL program using the following:
DSPFD FILE(SOMELIB/*ALL) TYPE(*MBR) +
OUTPUT(*OUTFILE) FILEATR(*PF) +
OUTFILE(QTEMP/REORGS)
The program will not compile because some of the numeric fields exceed 15.0.
Okay, that I understand. But is there a workaround? Heck, I don't even
need those fields.
Jerry C. Adams
IBM i Programmer/Analyst
And what is more, I agree with everything I have just said. - Piet
Koornhoff, South African ambassador to the U.S.
--
A&K Wholesale
Murfreesboro, TN
615-867-5070
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
