×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
From: Joe Pluta
So, did IBM just tighten up the rules a bit on the INSERT?
That wouldn't surprise me a bit. We had to tighten up some of our SQL procedure
interfaces between V5R4 and V6R1 to be precisely inline with IBM documentation.
I've run out of ideas.
That's hard to believe. You're usually a fountain of ideas ;-)
When some of our code broke, moving to V6R1, it annoyed me at first. Then I
realized that I was in no position to complain about it. If you can't count on
having numeric data in a numeric field, should you change it to character?
Something like that?
-Nathan
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.