Re: Lengthy SNA Distribution Recovery step in IPL

[Evan Harris <auctionitis@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Pete

QRYDST might help you shed some  more light on what if anything is
hanging round.

I wonder if a RCLDLO might be of any use - I seem to remember needing
to run these after recovering folders on some occasions. Still, that's
something of a shot in the dark. If you do this it might need to be
done in some kind of restricted state.

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Pete Helgren <pete@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  A few weeks back I dealt with an open relay issue on a 520 that I
> eventually got sorted out.  At least I *thought* I got it sorted out.
> The biggest fallout was that there were a jillion spool files generated
> in the process and it took a dltsplf and a rclsplstg to get back some
> critical space.  But I still have my suspicions that there are still
> files lurking.  What raised my suspicions was that last night when I
> IPL'd the SNA Distribution Recovery step took over an hour.  When I had
> IPL'd the system after the rclsplstg a few weeks ago the SNA
> Distribution Recovery step also took equally as long.  Seems like SNA is
> "recovering" but recovering what?
>
> So the questions are: Why is the IPL taking so long at that step
> (instead of minutes, like it used to)? Where should I look for
> "leftovers" after the open relay?  Could there be undelivered messages
> queued up somewhere?  WRKDSTQ shows nothing in any of the queues.
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Pete Helgren
> Value Added Software, Inc
> www.valadd.com
>
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.