× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Tommy,
I think they are converting fine. The OP just wants to know why they need
converting when they should have converted during restore.
But I could be wrong.
And you can have unobservable creation data, and still be converted. See
the help on FRCOBJCVN on RSTLIB. "An object must have creation data
(either observable or unobservable) to be converted."

Mark,
Option 3 does add "objects requiring conversion to be used by the current
version of the operating system". They didn't want that during restore
and changed it to 1. Therefore first touch or STROBJCVN should do it.
I strongly encourage STROBJCVN. Some conversions may take awhile and who
wants a user complaint that the new system takes longer to get into their
application? That's my problem with first touch. Also, if STROBJCVN
fails you deal with it before the user sees it. (Hoping that it's a fluke
because you ran ANZOBJCVN on the old system.) You can break STROBJCVN
into a job per library or whatever to multistring.

RSTLIB FRCOBJCVN(*NO) will override the system value QFRCCVNRST. Did they
do that?

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.