Re: 6.1 Create Index - Format Level Identifier

[Jeff Crosby <jlcrosby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm the guy (or at least one of) that discovered this on V5R4 and opened the
PMR on it.

I went to 6.1 about 18 months ago and I just flat out don't remember whether
PTFs were/are required on 6.1.  By that time, however, all my files had been
recreated via DDL instead of DDS, so I would not have experienced the issue.


On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Crispin Bates <cbates@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> I am looking to see if I can replace existing LF's with Index's at i 6.1. I
> thought that the new RCDFMT keyword would allow that, and it certainly seems
> to work quite nicely.
>
> I remember there being some PTF's (SI23355 and SI27866) for V5R4 issues
> where the newly created file had a different Record Format Level Idenfifier
> (RFLI) and this was caused by files that had Date Fields in them. I am
> finding that if my TABLE (PF) has a DATE field in it, then I am getting a
> different RFLI.
>
> To see what was happening I removed the Date Field, and I then get the same
> RFLI as the original LF had (which is exactly what I am after).
>
> Is this a case of the same issue has raised it's head at 6.1, but for a
> different reason (because the INDEX now supports the RCDFMT keyword)?, or am
> I completely missing something, and there is a PTF for this that I need to
> apply?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Crispin.
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.