×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
I am looking to see if I can replace existing LF's with Index's at i 6.1. I thought that the new RCDFMT keyword would allow that, and it certainly seems to work quite nicely.
I remember there being some PTF's (SI23355 and SI27866) for V5R4 issues where the newly created file had a different Record Format Level Idenfifier (RFLI) and this was caused by files that had Date Fields in them. I am finding that if my TABLE (PF) has a DATE field in it, then I am getting a different RFLI.
To see what was happening I removed the Date Field, and I then get the same RFLI as the original LF had (which is exactly what I am after).
Is this a case of the same issue has raised it's head at 6.1, but for a different reason (because the INDEX now supports the RCDFMT keyword)?, or am I completely missing something, and there is a PTF for this that I need to apply?
Thanks,
Crispin.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
