×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
CRPence wrote:
Do "going forward" and "going backward" mean to imply the use of
the expected /sequential access method/ [i.e. retrieve previous or
next] versus the unexpected /direct access method/ [i.e. retrieve by
rrn; for other than *START or *END] for row retrieval?
Hmmmmm......
Going to another ILE RPG test program, *START doesn't work for CHAIN,
but it works just fine for SETLL.
SETLL with *START gets me to a "good" record.
SETLL with 1 gets me to an "excluded" record.
SETLL with 0 gets me no record at all.
SETGT with 0 gets me to an "excluded" record.
Interesting, since I'm just about certain that MI is calling the same
thing an RPG SETLL calls, rather than what an RPG CHAIN calls.
--
JHHL
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.