× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Rob, good point, unfortunately we use the host table entries otherwise I
wouldn't want to mess with them, in any event I need to know if there was
any easy way to accomplish this.

On the second one, that would be nice but I don't have that luxury
currently.

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 8:07 AM, <rob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

1 - Should your hosts file really have that many entries? There's a
concept called "DNS" for Domain Name Service - embrace it.
2 - Bwahaha (evil laugh). I was always concerned with these "let's
pretend we're still running an AS/400 and try skipping releases, on to a
new box" upgrades. I suggest you upgrade the older box to V6R1.


Rob Berendt
--
Group Dekko Services, LLC
Dept 01.073
Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com





From: DrFranken <midrange@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 04/22/2010 09:25 PM
Subject: Re: V6R1 (QGPL/QUSRSYS) question.
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx



WELLLLLLLLLLL Here's the thing.

With V6R1 the file Qusrsys/QATHOHOST member HOSTS (Memory here, don't
quote me on that) is deprecitated, meaning the actual data is stored
somewhere else now. So if what you are really after is just the 'HOSTS'
file then this may not be your best option. You see the issue is that as
of V6R1 you can have more than 4 host names per IP address *AND you can
now put IPV6 addresses in there. As a consequence it's more than simply
restoring the correct ifle from QUSRSYS to get the hosts table updated.

I wish I could give you an awesome simple method to move just the hosts
file but sadly I cannot.

- DrFranken


On 4/22/2010 4:04 PM, Jack Kingsley wrote:
New box install but I need to port over HOST table file from QUSRSYS and
some misc objects from QGPL.

Is it better to go to restricted state then restore the V5R4 versions of
QGPL and QUSRSYS libraries then reinstall B2924_01 (QGPL/QUSRSY) again
or is
there a simplier method.


--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.