Re: 32 bit JVM

[Alan Campin <alan0307d@xxxxxxxxx>]

I used it quite a bit with Scott JDBC service program and didn't have any
problems. Couldn't tell you if I saw any better performance.

On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Chris Bipes
<chris.bipes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> Would anyone advise for or against changing the default JVM from Classic
> to the 32 bit version on V5R4?
>
>
>
> Where would you make a global change for the default?
>
>
>
> Hey I just upgrade from V5R3 to V5R4 on Sunday and I want to improve my
> JAVA performance. ( We are calling a JAVA stored procedure from an IIS
> web server.  Don't ask me why I would love the developer to rewrite in
> RPGLE and take JAVA out of the equation.)
>
>
>
> Chris Bipes
> Director of Information Services
> CrossCheck, Inc.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.