×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
James
I basically agree that PDM is fine. I use it a lot - and I have come to
appreciate the flexibility I have in WDSC/RDi to have lots of members
open in a larger project, especially when using a SCM to manage it all.
I know of a company using the TAATOOLS source control commands and doing
just fine - all that is done on the green screen. It's not a full-blown
SCM app, seems to be mostly checkout-checkin kind of stuff. It's enough
for them now. They can always use the graphical IDE if they want but
it's not integrated into WDSC.
I'm not ready to buy into the "it's new so it's best" concept. There is
still enough I can't do easily in WDSC that I go to PDM to do that kind
of work. Both tools are useful. SEU is still a very capable and powerful
editor - once you try F1 in the sequence number column and really learn
what you can do!! Of course, I do find myself forgetting where I am and
hitting the mouse wheel to scroll through source in SEU after working in
WDSC. :-)
Vern
James H. H. Lampert wrote:
Bryce Martin wrote:
That's like telling a lumber jack they can still use a 2 man saw to cut
down 100 year old oak trees.
And what in blazes is wrong with PDM?
--
JHHL
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
