× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Well, that would certainly be simpler, if it works, so I'll give it a try. So I can do both LIC and OS without hammering anything else? You just gotta love this OS!

It will be a long night tomorrow night.....

Pete


Pete Massiello wrote:
You could, but I would do this second. Slip the LIC will fix the MF* PTFs
under 999, and then you will need to install the OS to fix SS1.
First, I would just load a new cum right on the system and see if all the
pre-reqs then get fixed. Set to applied delayed.


Pete

Pete Massiello
iTech Solutions
http://www.itechsol.com

Add iTech Solutions on Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=126431824120
Add iTech Solutionw on LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2206093





-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pete Helgren
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 6:51 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Recovering from a hosed up CUME install

I have a customer that, for the life of me, managed to install a CUME that just never seemed to fully apply (V5R4). Over a year ago I invested 3 or 4 hours tracking which PTF(s) was(were) a co-req or a pre-req and eventually was so confused by the circular logic (who's on first, what's on second...) that I have decided to start with a new CUME and apply it *clean*. The question is, can I *undo* the previous CUME? I *think* the answer is yes, if I can slip the LIC and then load and apply the latest CUME.

Is that the best approach? Or should I just I just plan to upgrade to 6.1 and leave it at that? I'd rather not do the 6.1 upgrade at the moment so if there is a way to recover from a *bad* CUME install, I'd like to take that approach first.

Pete


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.