×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




Any PTF that are not applied or groups, delete. Then try the new CUME.
I just won the battle on a V5R3 box that was 5 cume's behind.

Chris Bipes
Director of Information Services
CrossCheck, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pete Helgren
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 3:51 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Recovering from a hosed up CUME install

I have a customer that, for the life of me, managed to install a CUME
that just never seemed to fully apply (V5R4). Over a year ago I
invested 3 or 4 hours tracking which PTF(s) was(were) a co-req or a
pre-req and eventually was so confused by the circular logic (who's on
first, what's on second...) that I have decided to start with a new CUME

and apply it *clean*. The question is, can I *undo* the previous CUME?

I *think* the answer is yes, if I can slip the LIC and then load and
apply the latest CUME.

Is that the best approach? Or should I just I just plan to upgrade to
6.1 and leave it at that? I'd rather not do the 6.1 upgrade at the
moment so if there is a way to recover from a *bad* CUME install, I'd
like to take that approach first.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.