RE: operations console via lan

["Pete Massiello" <pmassiello-ml@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

No, the correct value is Partition 1 if the machine is a 520.

Pete Massiello
iTech Solutions
http://www.itechsol.com

Add iTech Solutions on Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=126431824120
Add iTech Solutionw on LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2206093





-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jack Kingsley
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 3:07 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: operations console via lan

Just thought of something else, what LPAR is this for??  The default should
be for partition 0.

On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Jack Kingsley
<iseriesflorida@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> For the name is this in your host table file on the PC.  Do you have the
> correct subnet entered in your configs.
>
> What source code are you getting on the machine panel if any.
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 2:51 PM, <rob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > We've explained this a few times and you don't want to get it.
> > 1 - Twinax terminals were unpopular for most stuff, therefore you
couldn't
> > keep costs down by making them in quantity.  How many brand new twinax
> > consoles have you purchased in the last few years?
> > 2 - Attaching a twinax controller and IOP card uses up two precious
slots.
> >  Plus the costs of that equipment.
> > 3 - Your opinion of reliable and my opinion of reliable differ widely.
> > 4 - Twinax does not play well in a multiple lpar environment.  You'd need
> > something like an HMC anyway.
> > 5 - It's impossible to attach remotely to a "real" twinax terminal.
> > 6 - Remote service is enhanced when IBM has availability into something
> > like an HMC.
> >
> > Much of this applies to a direct attach KVM.  Granted a good KVM gives
you
> > remote capabilities, but doesn't solve all the issues.  Even with an HMC
I
> > do not usually use it "hands on" - even in the same room.  I access it
> > remotely.  I was accessing mine remotely while at my LUG this morning.
> > Doing a RCLSTG, full system save, etc while out of town.
> >
> >
> > Rob Berendt
> > --
> > Group Dekko Services, LLC
> > Dept 01.073
> > Dock 108
> > 6928N 400E
> > Kendallville, IN 46755
> > http://www.dekko.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From:   "James H. H. Lampert" <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To:     Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date:   02/09/2010 02:38 PM
> > Subject:        Re: operations console via lan
> > Sent by:        midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm going to be following this one myself.
> >
> > "LAN Console" has always struck me as a hookup mistake waiting to
> > happen, and I'll probably never understand why IBM dumped something as
> > robust and reliable as Twinax (or if they had to dump it, why they
> > didn't just put keyboard, mouse, and VGA ports into the box itself).
> >
> > --
> > JHHL
> > Still using real terminals. Even though I DESIGNED my emulator of choice.
> > --
> > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
> > list
> > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> >
> >
> > --
> > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
> > list
> > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.