Re: Anyone on V6R1.

[Alan Campin <alan0307d@xxxxxxxxx>]

Bummer. I wonder why IBM holds on to that system when they have the IFS with
all of the problems they have with QSPL?

On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Pete Massiello
<pmassiello-ml@xxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> NO, they still use QSPL libraries
>
> Pete
>
> Pete Massiello
> iTech Solutions
> http://www.itechsol.com
>
> Add iTech Solutions on Facebook:
> http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=126431824120
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Campin
> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 2:42 PM
> To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
> Subject: Anyone on V6R1.
>
> According to IBM documentation for V6R1 upgrade, they are rebuilding the
> output queues.
>
> Has anyone checked? Did they get rid of the silly QSPL library and go to
> using the IFS for spool files? I was hoping that is what this rebuilding
> was
> about in V6R1.
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>
>
>
>
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.