wouldn't going from 23 arms to 10 create a bottleneck at disk IO?

Not necessarily... Today's systems come with much bigger and faster disk

Dual CPU's will also help query performance via Symmetrical

The best thing I see here is the doubling of RAM ... IBM i loves RAM...

Kenneth E. Graap

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Cunningham
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 9:26 AM
To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'
Subject: 520 Config

We are looking to upgrade our 520 and our business partner has proposed
this config
2 CPUS 8300 CPW
10 - 139.5GB disk drives

We currently run 1 CPU, 16GB RAM and 23 drives of various sizes.

I know this is a hard question to answer without a whole lot more
information but, generally, wouldn't going from 23 arms to 10 create a
bottleneck at disk IO? If we have any bottleneck currently it is with
RAM (Websphere takes a lot) and an occasional spike in CPU. We wanted to
get dual CPUs because we do plan on doing some partitioning in the
future. I know this config was done using IBMs configuration tool, would
it build a system that was not going to perform well?
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].