|
If I remember right from a long time ago with an implementation of this typeof scenario with a 3582 that only had 2 I/O slots. To make it work you could
cartridge location but not eject the tape, send a report of what tapes are to
Otherwise, you could just use the media movement process to change the
waiting for the operator.
Again, not a smooth solution as just having the cartridges in the I/O station
could append the data to the end of the tape (unless each save is a full
Are the tapes full or is this a multiple system/partition backup? Maybe you
On Behalf Of lgoodbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Patrick Bingham
Power Systems Solutions Engineer
IBM Certified Advanced Technical Expert - Power Systems with IBM i
MSI Systems Integrators
(w) 402.965.2381
(c) 402.212.2944
(f) 402.965.2414
Your Business.Better
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 3:31 PMit just with the TS3100 or any unit
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: BRMS, TS3100 and being totally ridiculous
What does IBM say on the subject? Is
with a mail slot?
I do not have a single-feed unit. We use a 3581 (7 slots with 1 occupied
with barcode reader). The front panel opens to access the front 5 slots,
the other 2 slots are accessed via front slots 1/2 or 2/3 (if using
barcode reader). The BRMS move operation never attempts to eject the
tapes.
For what it's worth, our move policy "Verify moves" value is *YES:
*YES
Media moves performed for this move policy by the Move Media
using BRM (MOVMEDBRM) command must be verified by you.
*NO
Media moves performed for this move policy by the Move Media
using BRM (MOVMEDBRM) command are automatically verified by
BRMS.
Now our Windows servers tape drive is a PITA to use, just as you
describe. The backup software (I forget the name) makes you eject 1 tape
at a time, and you have to wait for it to deliver it to the mail slot.
Sorry I could not help more....
Loyd
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jerry Draper
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 12:44 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: BRMS, TS3100 and being totally ridiculous
The lack of integration between IBM's BRMS and the IBM TS3100 tape
magazine/drive (24 slots) makes for an awkward system that cannot be
automated.
BRMS is setup with a move policy that runs on Friday mornings. We move
tapes once per week. Eligible tapes need to have their locations
changed in the BRMS database from TAPMLB02 to OFFSITE. A movement
report needs to tell the operator which tapes to remove from the system.
Wouldn't it be nice if it worked seamlessly?
Running tape movement causes a tape error because only one tape can be
"ejected" from the TS3100 at a time. You just can't move tapes in BRMS
without the system trying to eject the tapes.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.