|
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:02 PM, M. Lazarus <mlazarus@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
James,
See inline:
At 5/11/09 11:38 AM, you wrote:
I guess I need to understand what you mean by "native". I don't thinkThe client can theoretically be any platform. By "native" I mean
something that only runs on Windows or only runs on Linux is a viable
solution these days. I would think that would be up to the developer what OS
to develop the GUI for.
that the languages and API's will directly support sending the
commands and maybe even the content of the GUI. A simple approach
could be some DDS extensions, accessible via an extension to the
EXFMT keyword. But I don't want to get into the implementation
now. I just believe that folks in the IBM labs have the smarts to
implement this, if IBM chooses to allow it.
Mark,
Where is IBM labs located? I suspect it no longer exists. Only by
being open sourced will IBM i ( call it "open i" ) get the
improvements it needs like remote desktop, managed code and a native
web server. My boycott of anything IBM continues until mgmt does right
by its legacy customers.
-Steve
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.