Re: 's400.access.ObjectDoesNotExistException

[Vern Hamberg <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Pete

I read it fast and must have seen the extra letter. Or maybe it was 
Nyquil delirium!

Vern

Pete Helgren wrote:
> The fact that it has the truncation could mean a few things.  If it is 
> just an aberration, perhaps something getting truncated in the stack 
> trace and it REALLY is a 'as400.access.ObjectDoesNotExistException" then 
> what you say would be the plausible solution Vern.  Not a program 
> problem but an environment/data issue where the Java program DID expect 
> to still have an object and it is not longer in the LIBL.  If I was a 
> betting man, I'd put my money there.
>
> But it *could" be some kind of typo in the code that hasn't been hit 
> before.  Something like:
>
> throw new 
> ObjectDoesNotExistException("s400.access.ObjectDoesNotExistException")  
> But that would be unlikely because such code would be unnecessary under 
> most conditions.
>
> That is a peculiar error though.  I would expected the message to read 
> 'com.ibm.as400.access.ObjectDoesNotExistException'.  How it "lost" the 
> first 9 characters is a mystery
>
> Pete
>
>
> Vern Hamberg wrote:
>   
> > This might belong in the java list, but this smacks of a library list 
> > issue. ObjectDoesNotExistException sounds a lot like "object not found" 
> > - this is almost always the problem when an interactive call works and a 
> > batch doesn't - server jobs rarely have the same library list as 
> > interactive ones, which use a whole different job description.
> >
> > HTH
> > Vern
> >
> > Dave Murvin wrote:
> >   
> >     
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > We just had a production error occur and we have not been able to 
> > > pinpoint the cause.  This is a Java application that calls an RPGLE 
> > > program via the toolbox.  When I run the program manually in green 
> > > screen mode, it works okay.   The error we see returned is 
> > > 's400.access.ObjectDoesNotExistException.
> > >
> > > We do not believe that anyone has changed anything, but no one in the 
> > > shipping department can ship anything.  I would have thought that the 
> > > error would start with as400.access...
> > >
> > > Any clues would be appreciated.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> > >   
> > >     
> > >