×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
I'm having a difficult time with the attached paragraph. To the best of my knowledge "strategic" is much better than "not strategic" (which I have heard in reference to other products in the past). What word do you associate with a product that IBM is planning to keep around for the forseeable future?
The two terms I have historically associated with 'oh oh' are "mature" and "tactical". I readily agree that "strategic" doesn't guarantee success, but I've never seen strategic mean dead.
Bruce (who also readily admits I generally don't pay much attention to this type of communication from IBM anyway)
Neil Palmer <neilpalmer400mr@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
Ross Mauri's recent letter included a very unfortunate word in describing "i". He called it "strategic". Today being November 11th I hope you all remember your history lessons, including what that designation means to IBM products and initiatives.
Neil Palmer, Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
(This account not monitored for personal mail,
remove the last two letters before @ for that)
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
